According to recent news from Culture Action Europe, the European Commission published its long-awaited Green paper entitled ‘Unlocking the potential of cultural and creative industries’. Aimed at the elaboration of a dedicated EU action plan for the cultural and creative industries, it also demands enhanced Member States’ policies in that field - at all relevant levels of governance, and a stronger coordination between them.
An important basis for the appearance of the ‘cultural and creative agenda’ at EU level was certainly the ‘Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs’ adopted in 2000. Aimed at boosting European economy and create employment, it articulated its action around innovation and knowledge-based growth - with sustained focus on education.
In the past decade, several initiatives were launched, and a number of documents and declarations prepared, negotiated, and adopted. Starting with the 2006 KEA report on ‘The Economy of Culture in Europe’ that seeks to legitimate the ‘cultural and creative industries’ paradigm at EU level, and offer key data on their contribution to Europe’s economy, followed by the 2007 Council Conclusions on the ‘Contribution of the cultural and creative sectors to the achievement of the Lisbon objectives’ and the 2007 Communication on a ‘European agenda for culture in a globalizing world’ which was based on the findings of an intergovernmental working group (Open method of Coordination) on the cultural and creative industries. Later, the 2009 European Year of Innovation and Creativity aimed at raising the profile of ‘creativity’ at EU level and at positioning cultural and creative industries in this new policy field. Last, but not least, the 2009 KEA report on ‘The Impact of Culture on Creativity’ that focuses on ‘culturebased creativity’ and that demands the broadening of ‘creativity policies’ to new sectors such as the arts, education, research, science, etc.
If this list is impressive, the road ahead is still more than rocky. A good example is the process that led to the adoption of the EU 2020 strategy earlier this year. If creativity appeared in the original EC consultation document, that launched the negotiation of the strategy, all references to creativity, culture, or cultural and creative industries disappeared from the final framework document. There are no references either in the operational guidelines of the strategy, despite the efforts of a couple of Member states, namely Poland and France. This illustrates once again the difficulty for culture and cultural industries concerns to make their way into other policy fields, or to be integrated on an equal footing in overarching economic or social agendas. This also considerably weakens DG EAC’s position, which faces important challenges at the time of defending its positions in a transversal way. This demonstrates once again the balance of power within the European Commission and the Council of the EU; a balance of power that is often mirrored at national level, when looking at the relationships between Culture Ministries and their economic counterparts.















